Investigating the Indicators of Good Urban Governance with an Emphasis on Smartness (Case study: Tabriz metropolis)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph. D of Urban and Regional Economics, University of Tabriz, Faculty of Economics and Management, Tabriz, Iran

2 Ph. D of Institutional Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Ph.D of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz , Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Increasing urbanization, population growth and the social, economic and environmental problems resulting from them, along with the growth and expansion of information and communication technology - as the main axis of transformation in the world - is the main feature of the 21st century. To deal with the challenge of cities, the concept of smart city has been presented. Good urban governance is presented as a prerequisite for a smart city by national and international organizations. Therefore, the idea of urban management and governance has been removed from its traditional state and improved. In other words, good and smart governance involves an open dialogue between citizens and city officials through an active ICT platform. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to answer the question that with the new changes in the field of technology in the cities of the country, especially the metropolises, what is the state of good governance indicators in the studied metropolis? And is the urban management in Tabriz metropolis able to improve the desirable urban governance indicators in line with the smart city indicators? The answers to the research questions have been done by using a combination of quantitative and qualitative models. The indicators of smart city and good urban governance have been extracted using questionnaire tools and statistics available in statistical yearbooks and analyzed in Python programming environment. The results show that the overall score of good governance in Tabriz metropolis is 0.436. Among the five indicators introduced by the United Nations, the effectiveness index is the most favorable and the equality index is the most unfavorable among other indicators.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
Afzali, M., Modiri, M., & Farhudi, R. A (2018). Prioritizing Indicators in the make Smart Process (Case Study: Kerman City). Research and urban planning, 9(35), 21-30. (in Persian)
Akbari, Gh (2006). Social capital and urban governance. Geographical Research, 21(4), 153-135.
Beginia, A. R., Safari, S., Morshidizad, A., & Poladrag, A. M (2011). Identification and prioritization of good governance indicators. Public Administration Perspective, 3(12), 65-86. (in Persian)
Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P (2009). Smart cities in Europe, series research memoranda 0048. VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics, 48.‏
Carbó-Ramírez, P., & Zuria, I (2011). The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(3), 213-222.‏
Correia, L. M., & Wünstel, K (2011). Smart Cities Applications and Requirements, White Paper of the Experts Working Group, Net! Works European Technology Platform.
Dept. Business (2013). Smart cities: background paper, UK Government, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, pp. 26-33.
Dixon, T., Farrelly, L., Horton-Baker, N., & Webb, R (2017). Re-imagining the future of cities using urban foresight techniques: towards a smart and sustainable Reading 2050.
Dong, F., Li, Y., Li, K., Zhu, J., & Zheng, L (2022). Can smart city construction improve urban ecological total factor energy efficiency in China? Fresh evidence from generalized synthetic control method. Energy, 241, 122909.
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N (2007). Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities. University of Ljubljana, Evert Meijers. Project homepage
Giffinger, R., & Gudrun, H (2010). Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities?. ACE: architecture, city and environment, 4(12), 7-26.
Golchini, S., Moradi, E., & Khezrnejad., P (2017). Investigating the Good Urban Governance Within the Framework of the Urban Management System (A Case Study of Sanandaj, Iran). Quarterly Journal of Environmental Based Territorial Planning, 52, 64-45. (in Persian) 
HABITAT, U (2009). Urban governance index (UGI) a tool to measure progress in achieving good urban governance. Available in unhabitat. org.‏
Hashemi, S. A., Rah-Najat, M., Sharifzadeh, F., & Saadi, M. R (2019). Relationship between Good Governance and a Smart City: A case study of Tehran. A Quarterly Journal of Socio-Cultural Strategy, 9(34), 67-90. (in Persian).
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M (2006). Governance matters V: governance indicators for 1996-2005. World Bank policy research working paper, 4012, 1740479-1150402582357.‏
Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M (2011). The triple-helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of urban technology, 18(2), 53-63.
Li, W., Batty, M., & Goodchild, M. F (2020). Real-time GIS for smart cities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34(2), 311-324.‏
Masik, G., Sagan, I., & Scott, J. W (2021). Smart City strategies and new urban development policies in the Polish context. Cities, 108, 102970.‏
Myeong, S., Kim, Y., & Ahn, M. J (2020). Smart city strategies—technology push or culture pull? A case study exploration of gimpo and namyangju, South Korea. Smart Cities, 4(1), 41-53.‏
Mutiara, D., Yuniarti, S., & Pratama, B (2018, March). Smart governance for smart city. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 126, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing.‏
Nowicka, K (2014). Smart city logistics on cloud computing model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 151, 266-281.
Papa, R., Gargiulo, C., & Galderisi, A (2013). Towards an urban planners’ perspective on Smart City. TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 6(01), 5-17.‏
Rahnama, M. R., Hosseini, S. M., & Mohammadi hamidi, S (2020). Measuring and assessment of smart city criteria in Metropolis Ahvaz. Researches of human geography, 52(2), 589-611. (in Persian) 
Rahmani, M. T., & Keshavarz, M (2012). Examining the model of good governance and the role of the government in the management and administration of the affairs of cities in Iran. Journal of Urban Ecology Research, 1(1), 23-55. (in Persian)
Sharifzadeh, F., & Qalipour, R. A (2003). Good governance and the role of the government. Managing Organizational Culture, 1(4), 93-110. (in Persian)
Shieh, E., Habibi, K., & Ehsani, M (2019). Role of intelligent management in urban physical planning in order to mitigate consequences of earthquakes. Hoviatshahr, 13(2), 37-50. (in Persian)
Voordijk, H., & Dorrestijn, S (2021). Smart city technologies and figures of technical mediation. Urban research & practice, 14(1), 1-26.‏
UCLG (2009). Smart cities study, The committee of digital and knowledge based cities of UCLG, International study on the situation of ICT, 24-36.
United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (2000), Principles of Good Urban Governance, UNCHS Global Campaign on Urban Governance.
 United Nations Development Programme (2000), The urban governance initiative, Kuala Lumpur: UNDP. (http//: www.tugi.org).
United Nations (2019). World Urbanization Prospects 2018: Highlights.‏
Yigitcanlar, T., & Kamruzzaman, M (2018). Does smart city policy lead to sustainability of cities?. Land use policy, 73, 49-58.