ارزیابی عملکرد تعاونی¬های کشاورزی در مناطق روستایی مطالعه موردی: شهرستان خرم¬آباد دکتر مهدی پورطاهری ، دکتر محمدحسین پاپلی ، علیرضا فلاحی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

10.22111/gdij.2012.423

چکیده

    توسعه‌ تعاونی­های کشاورزی در قالب تعاونی­­های صید و صیادی، گل و گیاه، زنبورداری، دامپروری، جنگل­داری، مرغداری و زنبورداری را می‌توان راهکار بسیار مناسبی در جهت توسعه کشاورزی، ارتقاء سطح دانش و آگاهی روستاییان، بهره‌برداری از منابع روستا، افزایش محصولات کشاورزی، جذب سرمایه و افزایش فرصت­های شغلی محسوب نمود.
    اگرچه در سال­های اخیر توسعه و ایجاد تعاونی­های کشاورزی مورد توجه برنامه­ریزان کشور قرار گرفته است اما تاکنون به­طور نظام­مند ارزیابی جامعی از ایجاد تعاونی­های کشاورزی در تحقق اهداف توسعه روستایی صورت نپذیرفته است. در سال­های اخیر استان لرستان به ویژه شهرستان خرم­آباد شاهد توسعه قابل توجه تعاونی­های کشاورزی در مناطق روستایی خود بوده است.
بررسی جامع به شیوه اسنادی و میدانی در خصوص عملکرد تعاونی­های کشاورزی شهرستان خرم­آباد در نزد دو گروه مدیران و اعضای تعاونی­ها در سه بُعد اقتصادی، اجتماعی و محیطی نشان داد که تعاونی­های کشاورزی از دیدگاه اعضاء از نظر مسائل اجتماعی، اقتصادی و محیطی موفق بوده اما از دیدگاه مدیران عامل  به ویژه از نظر مسائل اقتصادی و محیطی دارای عملکرد موفقیت­آمیزی نبوده‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessment the Performance of Agricultural Cooperatives in Rural Areas Case Study: Khoramabad Township Dr. Mehdi Pourtaheri Assistant Professor of Geography University of Tarbiat Modares Dr. Mohammad Hossien Papoli Professor of Geography University of Tarbiat Modares Alireza Fallahi M.S of Geography and Rural Planning

چکیده [English]

Introduction
In the recent years, agricultural cooperatives have played an important role in rural development through development of agriculture. Researchers are of the opinion that under normal circumstance agricultural cooperatives in the shape of fishing, animal husbandry, aviculture, forestry, beekeeping, flower and plant, play significant role in the provision of services that enhance agricultural development. They described agricultural cooperatives as a medium through which services like provision of farm input, farm implements, farm mechanization, agricultural loans, agricultural extension, members education, marketing of farm products and other economic activities and services rendered to members. Regular and optimal performance of these roles will accelerate the transformation of agriculture and rural economic development. So it seems that the agricultural cooperatives are considered to be the most important organizations that pay attention and try to support the rural development in general and the agricultural development in special through the activities and services achieved for the sake of farmers. Agricultural cooperatives have contributed greatly to the development of modern national and systematized agricultural production-base, helped enhance self-sufficiency of major staple foods, and strengthened farmers’ household economy by facilitating market access and competitiveness, adapting their operations to agricultural technological innovations and encouraging democratic decision-making processes, leadership development and education. In the recent years, Lorestan province, especially Khoramabad has witnessed a remarkable development of agricultural cooperatives in rural areas. Although the development of agricultural cooperatives have been attractive in this township, but there is no comprehensive assessment of creating the agricultural cooperatives for achievement of goals of rural development. So, the overall purpose of the study is to investigate whether cooperatives have contributed to positive change in the economic, social and environmental conditions among the two groups of cooperatives managers and members.  
 
Research Methodology
This research is applied-developing in scope and the methodology is descriptive-analytical. The data were collected among the two groups of cooperatives managers (15 managers) and members (123 members) by applying systematic random sampling technique. The scale was developed with 24 items for members and 18 items for cooperatives managers on a 3-point scale. Questions were closed and mainly focused on the economic, social and environmental dimensions, accordingly to the research goals. The selection of these items was based on previous researches and literature review. Reliability based on Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the final scale resulted in a robust value (0.8).Data from questionnaires analyzed by use of One-sample T-test, in SPSS software.
 
Discussion and Results
Cooperatives are defined as “an autonomous association of persons who unite voluntarily to meet their common economic and social needs and aspiration through a jointly owned and democratically controlled enterprise. Poverty, infrastructural backlog and illiteracy are amongst the most serious factors that inhibit growth of cooperatives in Iran. The present socio-economic challenges facing the poor, particularly in rural areas, encourage people to form cooperatives even if there is no demand for their produce in the marketplace. An agricultural cooperative is considered as one of the important economic and social organizations in rural societies. It plays an important role in the agricultural development and also has a significant role of rural development and poverty reduction as well. Perhaps the most striking finding of this research is the corroboration of one of the major inferences drawn from the qualitative method concerning the importance of agricultural cooperatives in rural development by the statistical results. The results of the one-sample t-test showed that kind of agricultural cooperatives are strongly influenced in rural areas, but the social aspect of agricultural cooperatives had the largest impacts on members. Thus confirming existent literature, and adding new information at the same time, it has been found that social impacts are superior to economic and environmental impacts from view point of members and cooperatives managers. The findings of this study suggest that agricultural cooperatives play a vital role in the socio-economic development of poor rural villages. Agricultural Cooperatives create self-employment and sometimes also temporary employment. In this regards it seems that agricultural cooperatives contribute to members livelihoods by providing some income and food for the families, Also provide space and time for socialization. So, agricultural Cooperatives are depicted as the engines of employment creation, poverty reduction and income generation at rural areas. Although, the study reveals that agricultural cooperatives are a profitable venture in the study area but it appear opportunities still exist for increasing income if the constraints identified by the members and cooperative managers are addressed.
  
Conclusion
The scope of this study was relatively small (fifteen cooperatives) and local (located in the rural areas in the Khoramabad in Lorestan province) and the results therefore are based on a particular defined study area. The results show that agricultural cooperatives have influenced positively on the socio-economic and environmental conditions in rural communities. These results further show that with government’s commitment to working with cooperatives, they can yield greater returns for the people, the government and the nation as a whole. Some of the contributions that different kinds of agricultural cooperatives have created employment creation, income generation, as well as better socio-economic living conditions among members. Agricultural cooperatives are therefore a suitable alternative to eradicate poverty in the rural areas. The results show that from view point of members, agricultural cooperatives are important organizations for sustaining food security and rural development but they have constraints and limitations in leadership and management. The major constraints identified by the members and managers include; inadequate capital, lack of access to credit facilities and low education. The agricultural cooperatives have failed to attract new members. Majority of cooperatives have 7 or 8 members that are a constraint on the base of cooperative’s articles of association. There is significant difference between view point of members and managers about economic, social and environmental impacts of agricultural cooperatives. It seems that the members are satisfied more than cooperatives managers. 





 
Assessment the Performance of Agricultural Cooperatives in Rural …
 
 
 
 





  
Keywords: Assessment, Agricultural cooperatives Performance, Rural areas, Khoramabad.
  
References
1-      Abdel-Seed Mohamed, F.( 2004). “Role of agricultural cooperatives in agricultural development -the case of menoufiya governorate, Egypt.” Institute fur Agrarpolitik, Marktforschung und Wirtschaftssoziologie Abteilung Welternährungswirtschaft.
2-      Bijman, J (2005). “Cooperatives and heterogeneous membership:eight propositions for improving organizational efficiency.” Paper presented at the EMNet Conference Budapest, Hungary, September 15-17, Wageningen University.
3-      British Columbia. (2005). “Agricultural  cooperatives a start guide.” Ministry of Agriculture and Food.
4-      Clegg, J. (2004). “Rural cooperatives in China.”  policy and practice, Department of Social and Psychological Sciences, Edge Hill College of Higher Education, Ormskirk, UK.
5-      Daman.Prakash(1999) “Social goals of cooperatives,” translation of Masomeh Rezaie , ESCAD publication, Tehran, Iran.
6-      Deller, S. Hoyt, A. Hueth, B. and Stukel, R (2009). “Research on the Economic Impact of Cooperatives.” Project Principal Investigators. University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives.
7-      Fulton, J. & Hine, S. (2001). “The Economic Impacts Associated with Locally Owned Agricultural Cooperatives: A Comparison of the Great Plains and the Eastern Cornbelt” Paper Presented at NCR-194 Research on Cooperatives Annual Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada USA.
8-      Gios, G. (2002). "Agricultural Cooperatives in the County of Trento (Italy): Economic, Organizational and Legal Perspectives", Department of Economics, University of Trento and Alceste Santuari Free University of Bozen, Journal of Rural Cooperation, 30(1), 3-12.
9-      Hong,G.&. Sporleder,T. (2007) “Does Social Capital Influence Member Participation in Agricultural Cooperatives? -Korean Agricultural Cooperatives” Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics Presented at NCERA-194 Annual Meeting.
10-  James W. Dunn, Jayson K. Harper, and Lynn F. Kime.(2005). “extension associate in agricultural economics.” College of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension, agalternatives.aers.psu.edu.
11-  John L. Adrian, Jr., and Thomas Wade Green, (2001). “Agricultural Cooperative managers and the business environment.” Journal of Agribusiness:17-33.
12-  Kraenzle, C. A. (1998). “Co-ops break supply sales record.” Rural Cooperatives 65(6), 4S6. [U.S. Department of Agriculture/Rural Development, Washington, DC.]
13-  LEE, K. (2008).”Korean Agricultural cooperatives as a model for development of the Lane County” Terminal project presented to the Department of Planning, Public Policy & Management of the University of Oregon for the degree of Master of Community and Regional Planning.
14-  Lin, D. (2006). "FFTC-NACF International Seminar on Agricultural Cooperatives in Asia_Innovations and Opportunities in the 21 Century, Country Report of Taiwan, Associate Researcher Research and Development Division National Training Institute for Farmers’ Organization, No. 113, Sec. 7, Chung-San
15-  Madane, M. (2003). “Cooperatives and the community cultural.” International Cooperative Alliance, Regional Office for Asia and the Far East. New Delhi.
16-  Mahdavi.M & Taherkhani.M (2005)“ Application of Statistics in Geography,”Ghomes Publication, Tehran, Iran.
17-  Ministry of cooperation and rural affairs (1974)“The role of agricultural cooperatives in marketing,” Number of 98.
18-  Ministry of cooperation (1972)“Principals and Operations of Agricultural Cooperatives,” Tehran, Iran.
19-  Olson, F (2002). “New generation cooperatives - who invests?” Quentin Burdick Center for Cooperatives Theron Kibbe, Farm Credit Services Gary Goreham, Nort Dakota State University.
20-  Pinto, A. C, ( 2009).” Agricultural cooperatives and farners organizations - role in rural development and poverty reduction -“ Swedish Cooperative Centre, Development Director Agricord (network of international agro-agencies), Board Member Stockholm.
21-  Prakash, D (2003). “Development of agricultural cooperatives -relevance of Japanese experiences to developing countries.” Paper presented at the 14th ICA Japan International Training Course on“Strengthening Management of Agricultural Cooperatives in Asia”.
22-  Royce, F. (1996). “Cooperative agricultural operations management on a CUBAN sugarcane farm.” A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Floridi in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the degree of master of science, University of Florida.
23-  Taghavi. Nematollah(1997) “Feasibility study of generative employment by cooperatives in E.Azarbaijan; Final report,” Tabriz, cooperation office.
24-  Taleb. Mehdi (1998)“ Principals and thoughts of cooperation,” University of Tehran Publication, First edition.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Assessment
  • Agricultural cooperatives Performance
  • Rural Areas
  • Khoramabad